Open Access
Issue
EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys
Volume 1, Number 1, December 2013
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 50
DOI https://doi.org/10.1140/epjnbp3
Published online 09 May 2013
  1. Finney DJ: Probit Analysis. London: Cambridge University Press; 1971.
  2. Ulfendahl M: Mechanical responses of the mammalian cochlea.Prog Neurobiol 1997, 53:331–380.
  3. Robles L, Ruggero MA: Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.Physiol Rev 2001, 81:1305–1352.
  4. Schairer KS, Nizami L, Reimer JF, Jesteadt W: Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones.J Acoust Soc Am 2003, 113:1560–1573.
  5. Schairer KS, Messersmith J, Jesteadt W: Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.J Acoust Soc Am 2008, 124:2196–2215.
  6. Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ: Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 103:1598–1608.
  7. Yates GK, Winter IM, Robertson D: Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range.Hear Res 1990, 45:203–219.
  8. Nizami L, Schneider BA: The fine structure of the recovering auditory detection threshold.J Acoust Soc Am 1999, 106:1187–1190.
  9. Nizami L: On auditory dynamic range.PhD thesis. University of Toronto: Psychology Department; 1999.
  10. Nizami L, et al.: The human cochlear mechanical nonlinearity inferred through the Schairer et al. (2003) model. In Fechner Day 2012: proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, October 2012. Edited by: Leth-Steensen C, Schoenherr JR. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: International Society for Psychophysics; 2012:12–17.
  11. Gabor D: Theory of communication.J Inst Elec Eng London 1946, 93:429–457.
  12. Schneider BA, Pichora-Fuller MK, Kowalchuk D, Lamb M: Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults.J Acoust Soc Am 1994, 95:980–991.
  13. Nizami L: Threshold vs. duration for Gaussian-shaped tone-pips of one to four periods duration.Percept Motor Skills 2004, 99:821–836.
  14. Nizami L: Afferent response parameters derived from postmasker probe- detection thresholds: ‘the decay of sensation’ revisited.Hear Res 2003, 175:14–35.
  15. Rhode WS, Recio A: Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea.J Acoust Soc Am 2000, 107:3317–3332.
  16. Nuttall AL, Dolan DF: Steady-state sinusoidal velocity responses of the basilar membrane in guinea pig.J Acoust Soc Am 1996, 99:1556–1565.
  17. Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A, Narayan SS, Robles L: Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.J Acoust Soc Am 1997, 101:2151–2163.
  18. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR: The Cochlea. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
  19. Nizami L, Reimer JF, Jesteadt W: The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.J Acoust Soc Am 2001, 110:2505–2515.
  20. Nizami L: Estimating auditory neuronal dynamic range using a fitted function.Hear Res 2002, 167:13–27.
  21. Sachs MB, Abbas PJ: Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli.J Acoust Soc Am 1974, 56:1835–1847.
  22. Palmer AR, Evans EF: Cochlear fibre rate-intensity functions: no evidence for basilar membrane nonlinearities.Hear Res 1980, 2:319–326.
  23. Dai H: On measuring psychometric functions: a comparison of the constant- stimulus and adaptive up-down methods.J Acoust Soc Am 1995, 98:3135–3139.
  24. Green DM, Swets JA: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Los Altos, California, USA: Peninsula Publishing; 1988.
  25. Nizami L, Reimer JF, Jesteadt W: The mid-level hump at 2 kHz.J Acoust Soc Am 2002, 112:642–653.
  26. Nizami L: The intensity-difference limen for 6.5 kHz: an even more severe departure from Weber’s law.Percept Psychophys 2006, 68:1107–1112.
  27. Zwislocki J, Maire F, Feldman AS, Rubin H: On the effect of practice and motivation on the threshold of audibility.J Acoust Soc Am 1958, 30:254–262.
  28. Lukaszewski JS, Elliott DN: Auditory threshold as a function of forced-choice technique, feedback, and motivation.J Acoust Soc Am 1962, 34:223–228.
  29. Loeb M, Dickson C: Factors influencing the practice effect for auditory thresholds.J Acoust Soc Am 1961, 33:917–921.
  30. Whitmore JK, Ermey HL, Williams PI: Some results bearing on the stability of psychometric data.J Acoust Soc Am 1968, 44:370.
  31. Weber DL, Moore BCJ: Forward masking by sinusoidal and noise maskers.J Acoust Soc Am 1981, 69:1402–1409.
  32. Zwicker E: Dependence of post-masking on masker duration and its relation to temporal effects in loudness.J Acoust Soc Am 1984, 75:219–223.
  33. Garcia-Perez MA: A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method.J Acoust Soc Am 2011, 130:2098–2107.
  34. Nizami L: Dynamic range relations for auditory primary afferents.Hear Res 2005, 208:26–46.
  35. Kohlrausch A, Puschel D, Alphei H: Temporal resolution and modulation analysis in models of the auditory system. In Speech research 10: the auditory processing of speech Edited by: Schouten MEH. 1992, 85–98.
  36. Vaux DL: Know when your numbers are significant.Nature 2012, 492:180–181.
  37. Hartmann WH: Signals, Sound, and Sensation. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
  38. McGee JD: Phase-locking as a frequency and intensity coding mechanism in auditory nerve fibers. MS thesis: Creighton University; 1983.
  39. Liberman MC: Physiology of cochlear efferent and afferent neurons: direct comparisons in the same animal.Hear Res 1988, 34:179–192.
  40. Palmer AR, Evans EF: On the peripheral coding of the level of individual frequency components of complex sounds at high sound levels. In Hearing mechanisms and speech. Edited by: Creutzfeld O, Scheich H, Schreiner C. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1979:19–26.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.