Open Access
EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys
Volume 1, Number 1, December 2013
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 09 May 2013
  1. Information about the Physical Sciences Oncology Centers Network is available through the National Cancer Institute, Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives. website at: [Google Scholar]
  2. Information about the Cancer Center Support Grant Guidelines and the Cancer Centers program. available at: [Google Scholar]
  3. Rosenfeld PL: The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences.Soc Sci Med 1992, 35:1343–57. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hiatt RA, Haslam ZS, Osuch J: The breast cancer and the environment research centers: Transdisciplinary research on the role of the environment in breast cancer etiology.Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Centers Environmental Health Perspectives 2009,117(12):1814–22. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gehlert S, McClintock M, Conzen S, Olufunmilayo O: The Importance of Transdisciplinary Collaborations for Understanding and Resolving Health Disparities.Soc Work Public Health 2010, 25:408–422. [Google Scholar]
  6. Osuch JR, Silk K, Price C, Barlow J, Miller K, Hernick A, Fonfa A: A historical perspective on breast cancer activism in the United States: from education and support to partnership in scientific research.J Womens Health 2012, 21:355–362. [Google Scholar]
  7. Datta S: Bay Area PS-OC Self Profile.National Cancer Institute Physical Sciences in Oncology Perspectives 2011, 2:4–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dusheck J: Physical scientists take on cancer.Nature 2012, 491:S49-S67. [Google Scholar]
  9. Information about Project LEAD of National Breast Cancer Coalition. available at the website at: [Google Scholar]
  10. Information about advocacy training at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. available at: and [Google Scholar]
  11. Information about the Survivor and Patient Advocacy Program at the American Association for Cancer Research. available at: [Google Scholar]
  12. Information about the Advocate Program at the American Association for Clinical Oncology. available at: [Google Scholar]
  13. Information about Komen Advocates in Science is available through Susan G. Komen for the Cure. website at: [Google Scholar]
  14. Information about the trainings offered by the Research Advocacy Network. available at: [Google Scholar]
  15. Information about the trainings offered by Genetic Alliance. available at: [Google Scholar]
  16. Information about the website trainings offered by Cancer Information Services Network. available at: [Google Scholar]
  17. Information about Kay Dickersin, Ph.D. and Musa Mayer’s tutorial, “Understanding Evidence-Based Healthcare: A Foundation for Action”. available on the website: [Google Scholar]
  18. Information about the Office of Office of Advocacy Relations is available through the National Cancer Institute. website: [Google Scholar]
  19. Information about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Consumer Advisory Committee. available on the FDA website: [Google Scholar]
  20. Information about the Department of Defense (DOD) Breast Cancer Research Program (BCRP). available on the Department of Defense website: [Google Scholar]
  21. Information about the California Breast Cancer Research Program (CBCRP). available on the website: [Google Scholar]
  22. Baas C: The Role of the Advocate: Helping Unravel the Complexity of Cancer.National Cancer Institute Physical Sciences in Oncology Perspectives 2010, 1:17–18. [Google Scholar]
  23. Information about the NCI Specialized Programs Of Research Excellence (SPORE). available at the website: [Google Scholar]
  24. Perlmutter J: Advocate Involvement in I-SPY 2.Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly 2011, 22:21–23. Further information about the I SPY 2 Advocacy Program is available at the website: [Google Scholar]
  25. Information about the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC). available at the website: [Google Scholar]
  26. Silk KJ, Neuberger LB, Nazione SA, Ousch J: The Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Centers: a transdisciplinary model. In Contemporary Issues in Health Communication: Theoretical and Practical Case Studies. Edited by Quesry J, Brann M. New York: Springer Publishing; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  27. Information about the Bay Area Breast SPORE Advocacy Core is available on the UCSF. website: [Google Scholar]
  28. Office of Advocacy Relations at the National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health: Advocates in Research Working Group Recommendations. 2011. available at the website: [Google Scholar]
  29. Samson S: Bay Area Physical-Sciences in Oncology Center (PS-OC) Advocacy Forward: Move It!National Cancer Institute Physical Sciences in Oncology Perspectives 2012, 1:16–17. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bennett ML, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S: Collaboration and Team Science: A Field Guide. 2010. Available at the website: http:/// [Google Scholar]
  31. Drew HC, Pettibone KG, Anderson B, Beard SD, Davis HL, Dilworth CH, O’Fallon L, Collman GW: Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: NIH Publication No. 12–7825; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  32. Information about Faster Cures, The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions, and their blog. available on the website: [Google Scholar]
  33. Information about The Biomarkers Consortium and QuantumLead Healthcare. available on the websites: http://www.biomarkersconsortium.organd [Google Scholar]
  34. Dresser R: When science offers salvation: patient advocacy and research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayer M: A Seat at the Table: A Research Advocate’s Journey.Journal of Participatory Medicine 2009,1(1):e14. [Google Scholar]
  36. Collyar D: How Have Patient Advocates in the United States Benefited Cancer Research?Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5:73–78. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mayer M: Patient Advocacy in Research Merely an Afterthought?Patient 2011,4(2):69–71. [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper C, Armitage CJ, Barber R: Credibility and the ‘professionalized’ lay expert: Reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research.Health (London) 2012,16(6):602–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Epstein S: The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the foregoing of credibility in the reform of clinical trials.Science, Technology, & Human Values 1995, 20:408–437. [Google Scholar]
  40. Manganiello M, Anderson M: Back to Basics: HIV/AIDS Advocacy As A Model for Catalyzing Change.Strategists and Faster Cures and HCM Strategists 2011, 1–27. available on the website: [Google Scholar]
  41. Information about the National Breast Cancer Coalition’s 2020 deadline challenge can be gleaned from their website. [Google Scholar]
  42. ScienceDaily (Sep. 21, 2012): Information about Moon Shots program. available at the website: [Google Scholar]
  43. Misguided cancer goalNature 2012, 491:637. doi:10.1038/4916379. [Google Scholar]
  44. Collins FS: Reengineering translational science. The Time is right.Sci Transl Med 2011, 3:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sharp PA, Langer R: Promoting Convergence in Biomedical Science.Science 2011, 333:527. [Google Scholar]