Open Access
EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys
Volume 1, Number 1, December 2013
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 25
Published online 09 May 2013
  1. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo W, Bressler S: Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance.Biol Cybern 2001, 85:145–157. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sameshima K, Baccala LA: Using partial directed coherence to describe a neuronal assembly interactions.J Neurosci Methods 1999, 94:93–103. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baccala L, Sameshima K: Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination.Biol Cybern 2001, 84:463–474. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Y, Bressler SL, Ding M: Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data.J Neurosci Methods 2006, 150:228–237. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Eichler M, Peifer M, Hellwig B, Guschlbauer B, Lucking CH, Dahlhaus R, Timmer J: Testing for directed influences among neural signals using partial directed coherence.J Neurosc Methods 2005, 152:210–219. [Google Scholar]
  6. Granger CWJ: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross‐spectral methods.Econometrica 1969, 37:424–438. [Google Scholar]
  7. Granger CWJ: Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint.J Econ Dynamics Control 1980, 2:329–352. [Google Scholar]
  8. Granger CWJ, Morris MJ: Time series modelling and interpretation.J R Stat Soc Ser A 1976, 139:246–257. [Google Scholar]
  9. Geweke J: Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series.J Am Stat Assoc 1982, 77:304–313. [Google Scholar]
  10. Geweke J: Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series.J Am Stat Assoc 1984, 79:907–915. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaminski M, Blinowska K: A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures.Biol Cybern 1991, 65:203–210. [Google Scholar]
  12. Blinowska K: Methods for localization of time‐frequency specific activity and estimation of information transfer in brain.Int J Bioelectromagnetism 2008,10(1):2–16. [] [Google Scholar]
  13. Takahashi DS, Baccala LA, Sameshima K: Information theoretic interpretation of frequency domain connectivity measures. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Blinowska K: Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data.Med Biol Eng Comput 2011, 49:521–529. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jovanović A: Research in the group for intelligent systems at Belgrade University, problems and results (Russian).Intelektualnie Sistemi 2001,6(1–4):163–182. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jovanović A, Perović A: Brain computer interfaces ‐ some technical remarks.Int J Bioelectromagnetism 2007,9(3):91–102. [] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klonowski W, Duch W, Perović A, Jovanović A: Some computational aspects of the brain computer interfaces based on inner music.Comput Intell Neurosci 2009, 9. Article ID 950403, [Google Scholar]
  18. Baccala L, Sameshima K: Overcoming the limitations of correlation analysis for many simultaneously processed neural structures. In Chapter 3 Progress in brain research, vol 130 Edited by: Nicolelis MAL. Elsevier Sc. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  19. Blinowska K, Kus R, Kaminski M, Janiszewska J: Transmission of brain activity during cognitive task.Brain Topogr 2010, 23:205–213.. [Google Scholar]
  20. Brzezicka A, Kaminski M, Kaminski J, Blinowska K: Information transfer during a transitive reasoning task.Brain Topogr 2011, 24:1–8.. doi: [Google Scholar]
  21. Kus R, Blinowska K, Kaminski M, Basinska‐Starzycka A: Transmission of information during continuous attention test.Acta Neurobiol Exp 2008, 68:103–112. [Google Scholar]
  22. Blinowska K: Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data.Med Biol Eng Comput 2011, 49:521–529.. [Google Scholar]
  23. Babiloni F, Mattia D, Basilisco A, Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Ding L, Christine K, Sweeney J, Edgar JC, Miller GA, He B: Improved estimation of human cortical activity and connectivity with the multimodal integration of neuroelectric and hemodynamic data related to motor and cognitive tasks.Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005, 6:5888–58891. [Google Scholar]
  24. Brovelli A, Ding M, Ledberg A, Chen Y, Nakamura R, Bressler SL: Beta oscillations in a large‐scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:9849–9854. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yuan H, Doud A, Gururajan A, He B: Localization of event‐related (de)synchronization of cerebral cortex during online control of brain‐computer interface using minimum‐norm estimates in the frequency domain.Int J Bioelectromagnetism 2007,9(2):109–110. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dhamala M, Rangarajan G, Ding M: Estimating granger causality from fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data.Phy Rev Lett 2008,100(018701):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Singh H, Li Q, Hines E, Stocks N: Classification and feature extraction strategies for multi channel multi trial BCI data.Int J Bioelectromagnetism 2007,9(4):233–236. [] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang X, Chen Y, Bressler S, Ding M: Granger causality between multiple interdependent neurobiological time series: blockwise versus pairwise methods.Int J Neural Syst 2007,17(2):71–78. [Google Scholar]
  29. Babiloni F, Cincotti F, Marciani M, Salinari S, Astolfi L, Tocci A: The estimation of cortical activity for brain‐computer interface: applications in a domotic context.Comput Intell Neurosci 2007, 7. Article ID91651, [Google Scholar]